WATERBURY, CT – Connecticut’s modified comparative negligence law creates a critical threshold that can determine whether car accident victims recover compensation or receive nothing at all. Waterbury personal injury attorney Dan Petroskey of DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. (https://www.defronzolawfirm.com/what-happens-to-my-connecticut-car-accident-case-if-im-51-at-fault/) explains how fault allocation under Connecticut General Statutes § 52-572h directly impacts an injured party’s ability to recover damages.
According to Waterbury personal injury attorney Dan Petroskey, Connecticut follows a modified comparative negligence system that allows accident victims to recover damages only when their assigned fault does not exceed 50 percent. If an individual is found 51 percent or more at fault for a collision, the law completely bars recovery regardless of the severity of injuries or the other driver’s negligence. “The difference between 50 percent fault and 51 percent fault is the difference between partial compensation and no compensation at all,” explains Petroskey.
Waterbury personal injury attorney Dan Petroskey notes that fault is determined by examining all available evidence, including police reports, witness statements, photographs, video footage, and electronic data from vehicle event data recorders. Courts and insurance adjusters review factors such as traffic violations, driver behavior, road conditions, visibility, and vehicle damage patterns when assigning percentages of fault to each party involved in a crash.
Attorney Petroskey emphasizes that insurance companies frequently attempt to assign exaggerated fault percentages to claimants in order to reduce payouts or push fault above the 50 percent threshold. “Adjusters may seize on minor admissions or statements made at the scene to argue a claimant was more responsible than the evidence supports,” he notes. “Individuals should avoid giving recorded statements or accepting blame before consulting legal counsel.”
The proportional reduction under § 52-572h applies to both economic and non-economic damages. Medical expenses, lost wages, lost earning capacity, property damage, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life are all reduced by the assigned fault percentage. For example, an individual found 30 percent at fault with $100,000 in total damages would recover $70,000 after the proportional reduction.
Petroskey advises that fault determinations are not final until a settlement is reached or a jury renders a verdict. Challenging an insurer’s fault assignment may involve presenting traffic camera footage, event data recorder downloads, expert accident reconstruction reports, and witness testimony that contradicts the opposing party’s account. The Waterbury Superior Court at 400 Grand Street handles personal injury cases in the Waterbury Judicial District.
“Preserving evidence immediately after a crash is essential,” advises Petroskey. “Photographs of vehicle damage, skid marks, road conditions, and traffic signals can significantly influence how fault is allocated.” Connecticut’s statute of limitations under General Statutes § 52-584 generally provides two years from the date of injury discovery to file a claim, but no more than three years from the date of the accident.
Connecticut’s comparative negligence rule applies to most negligence-based car accident claims, including motorcycle crashes, pedestrian accidents, and multi-vehicle collisions with multiple at-fault parties. However, the rule does not apply in cases involving intentional misconduct or reckless conduct, where different legal standards govern liability.
If an individual’s total damages amount to $200,000, including $80,000 in medical expenses, $20,000 in lost wages, and $100,000 in pain and suffering, and they are assigned 30 percent fault, the recovery would be $140,000 after the proportional reduction. Both economic damages, such as medical bills and lost earning capacity, and non-economic damages, such as emotional distress and loss of enjoyment of life, are reduced by the assigned fault percentage.
For those involved in car accidents where fault is being disputed, consulting an experienced personal injury attorney may help protect the right to recover compensation under Connecticut law.
About DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C.:
DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. is a Waterbury-based law firm focused on personal injury law. Led by attorney Dan Petroskey, the firm has over 20 years of experience representing car accident victims throughout Waterbury, New Haven County, and Connecticut. The firm maintains offices in Waterbury and Wallingford and works on a contingency basis. For consultations, call (203) 756-7408.
Embeds:
Youtube Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eP24JM3xJvM
GMB: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=2074756120617399372
Email and website
Email: iacruz@defronzolaw.com
Website: https://www.defronzolawfirm.com/
Media Contact
Company Name: DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C.
Contact Person: Dan Petroskey
Email: Send Email
Phone: (203) 756-7408
Address:255 Bank St # 2b, Waterbury, CT 06702
City: Waterbury
State: Connecticut
Country: United States
Website: https://www.defronzolawfirm.com/
Press Release Distributed by ABNewswire.com
To view the original version on ABNewswire visit: Waterbury Personal Injury Attorney Dan Petroskey Explains How Connecticut’s 51% Fault Rule Affects Car Accident Claims
